With civilisation comes roads – and that is going to be especially true on the moon, just to keep the dust away. Lunar dust is ultra-fine, abrasive and clingy. In the Apollo era dust clogged equipment and eroded spacesuits.
Notably, when the Apollo 17 lunar rover lost its rear fender, the vehicle became so coated in driven-up dust that it threatened to overheat until astronauts improvised a fix using recycled lunar maps. The Soviet Union’s Lunokod 2 rover did indeed perish through overheating when its radiator got covered in dust.
The Surveyor 3 lander was sandblasted with dust when the Apollo 12 Lunar Module landed around 180 metres away. Current NASA modelling suggests that as lunar landers touch down, their thruster plumes could dislodge tonnes of dust, potentially adhering to lander surfaces as well as covering the entire vicinity of the landing.
The most practical response is to keep dust at bay by paving over areas of activity on the moon, including roads and landing pads. The idea of melting sand to make roadways was first proposed for earth – back in 1933.
ESA’s PAVER project investigated the feasibility of this same approach for lunar roadmaking. The consortium is led by Germany’s BAM Institute of Materials Research and Testing with Aalen University in Germany, LIQUIFER Systems Group in Austria and Germany’s Clausthal University of Technology, with support from the Institute of Materials Physics in Space of the German Aerospace Center, DLR.
The PAVER consortium made use of a 12-kilowatt carbon dioxide laser to melt simulated moondust into a glassy solid surface as a way of constructing paved surfaces on the face of the moon.
As ESA materials engineer Advenit Makaya explains, the project is in fact returning to the original 1933 concept: “In practice, we would not bring a carbon dioxide laser on the moon. Instead this current laser is serving as a light source for our experiments, to take the place of lunar sunlight which could be concentrated using a Fresnel lens a couple of metres across to produce equivalent melting on the surface of the Moon.
“During past in-situ resource utilisation projects – including brick building using mirror-concentrated solar head – we’ve been looking at surface melting limited to relatively small melt spots, from a few milimetres to a couple of centimetres in diameter. For building roads or landing pads, a much wider focal point is required to be able to scan a very wide area in a practical timescale.”
At facilities installed at Clausthal University of Technology, the consortium achieved a spot size of 5cm to 10cm.
Proceeding through trial and error, they devised a strategy using a 4,5cm diameter laser beam to produce triangular, hollow-centred geometric shapes approximately 20cm across. These could be interlocked to create solid surfaces across large areas of lunar soil which could serve as roads or landing pads.
Advenit adds: “It actually turned out to be easier to work with regolith with a larger spot size, because at millimetre scale heating produces molten balls that surface tension makes hard to aggregate together. The larger beam produces a stable layer of molten regolith that is easier to control.
“The resulting material is glasslike and brittle, but will mainly be subject to downward compression forces. Even if it breaks we can still go on using it, repairing it as necessary.”
The team found that reheating a cooled track can cause it to crack, so they moved to geometries involving minimal crossovers. A single melt layer is about 1,8cm deep; built structures and roads might be composed of several layers, depending on the load forces required.
Jens Günster, heading the Multimaterial Manufacturing Processes Division at BAM, explains: “Such high depth of melting to produce massive structures can only be reached by large laser spots.”
The team estimates a 100 square metre landing pad with a thickness of 2cm of dense material might be constructed in 115 days.
This project originated from a call for ideas run by the Discovery element of ESA’s Basic Activities through the Open Space Innovation Platform (OSIP).
This sought out research ideas related to off-Earth manufacturing and construction.
The call was answered no less than 69 times. Of those, a total of 23 ideas have been implemented – based on an evaluation by a panel of ESA experts, who scored the ideas on their novelty.
“This initial call has been an effective investment from our point of view,” notes Advenit, “It has opened up multiple promising tracks for follow-up investigation.”