A new comprehensive review evaluates how earth observation (EO) technologies and big data platforms are being harnessed to monitor and understand human health.
The new research highlights the potential for disease modelling, environmental exposure assessment, and public health decision-making – but also the need for increased interdisciplinary collaboration, data consolidation, and improved data accessibility.
Earth observation plays a crucial role in the monitoring of the environment, climate, and weather as well as monitoring natural disasters and human activities. EO data refers to information collected about the earth’s surface, atmosphere, and oceans using remote sensing technologies such as satellites, aircrafts, drones, and ground-based sensors.
The integration of EO and big data into human health research has expanded significantly over the last 30 year, growing from two scientific publications in 1991 to 266 in 2024.
This wealth of information has proved invaluable in understanding the intricate dynamics between environmental factors and human health providing insight into the prevalence and spread of diseases, the impact of natural disasters, and the effectiveness of public health interventions.
However, despite this growth, the field remains fragmented due to inconsistent data formats, limited data accessibility, and weak interdisciplinary collaboration between EO data producers, data managers, and public health practitioners. This hampers the effective translation of EO insights into practice.
The study team undertook a detailed bibliometric analysis of 1 751 research documents – identifying 22 big data platforms that combine EO and health data – to provide a data-driven baseline for tracking global trends and innovations at the intersection of EO and health.
Dr Dhritiraj Sengupta, lead author and former earth observation scientist at Plymouth Marine Laboratory when this work was completed (currently at GMV), comments: “This review study provides an understanding of the challenges and opportunities which lie on the plate for both the health and earth observation professional, and encourages cross discipline collaboration.”
Key findings from the comprehensive review include:
Cross-sector and interdisciplinary collaboration: the paper underscores the growing role of interdisciplinary partnerships in this domain. Data requirements for health research highlights the need for interdisciplinary teams and co-production should replace producers-versus-users approach to make progress.
Focus areas in health monitoring: the paper explored how satellite imagery and environmental data can be integrated with big data analytics for health applications. Frequent topics include air pollution, dengue fever, and cholera. However, it was clear that EO data is under-utilised and emphasises the need for greater integration of EO data into health research.
Emerging platforms for health data: the paper maps the evolving landscape of data platforms that manage, analyse, and operationalise the extensive stream of EO data enabling powerful insights and applications across global-scale health initiatives.
Some platforms focus on animal health and zoonotic (animal/human transmitted) disease surveillance providing data to support early detection and response to prevent outbreaks that could impact both animals and humans. Other platforms concentrate on EO data crucial for understanding how climate change and environmental factors influence health outcomes.
These platforms are particularly important in the context of rising global temperatures and changing ecosystems which can alter the distribution of diseases and increase the frequency of extreme weather events that pose health risks.
Strategic future insights: the paper highlights emerging domains and platform capabilities aiming to guide policymakers, researchers, and technologists toward building resilient, data-informed public health infrastructures.
The study concludes that:
- Economically, EO data offers cost-effective global insights, yet funding remains a hurdle.
- Socially, public health awareness can be raised by transparency and accessibility of data, but cultural and technological differences pose barriers.
- Technologically, advancements such as Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and high-resolution imaging offer novel opportunities for disease forecasting and environmental monitoring, but gaps in data quality and resolution persist.
- Legally, EO data supports advocacy and global non-governmental organisations (NGOs), yet it is not universally recognised as a valid source of evidence.
- Environmentally, EO platforms enhance the analysis of climate trends and disease outbreaks, but raise concerns about carbon emissions and space debris. Addressing these factors holistically is crucial for leveraging EO data platforms in the health sector.
“The strengths of EO data in human health research lies in its ability to provide user-ready data at various scale which supports evidence-based decision-making and improved spatial and temporal coverage,” says Prof Sathyendranath. “ However, these platforms face challenges such as skill gaps, data privacy concerns, and a lack of political recognition.”