Most of Eskom’s ageing coal power stations cause severe air pollution, but new regulations could force the power utility to comply with pollution standards or shut for the worst-offending plants.
For years, Eskom has been allowed to postpone its compliance with air pollution standards and, in other instances government has failed to take enforcement action against its pollution.
Now, the Department of Environmental Affairs is closing some of these loopholes.
Proposed amendments to law published under the Air Quality Act will only permit one postponement of compliance – for five years – with standards which should be met by April 2020 (called “new plant” standards).
The new provisions would allow industrial facilities, by 31 March 2019, to apply for a once-off suspension of compliance timeframes with new plant standards if they provide a clear schedule for decommissioning by 2030.
The new rules would mean that all of Eskom’s stations must make the necessary investments in time to comply with new plant standards by 1 April 2025, unless it has been granted the suspension, and will decommission by not later than 2030. If it cannot meet the standards by this date and has not been granted a suspension, it can no longer operate.
Robby Mokgalaka, coal campaign manager for environmental justice organisation groundWork, says: “Finally, the Department of Environmental Affairs seems to be listening to the pleas of communities who breathe these toxic fumes every day. Health research shows that just one type of pollution from Eskom’s stations causes the death of more than 2200 people every year.”
Robyn Hugo, head of the Centre for Environmental Rights’ pollution and climate change programme, welcomes the proposed amendments, saying that the Life After Coal Campaign has been advocating for stricter pollution rules for coal power plants for many years.
“So far, Eskom’s strategy has simply been to apply for what it terms ‘rolling postponements’ of compliance with pollution standards: re-applying for postponements of compliance every five years until the plants are eventually decommissioned. That head-in-the-sand strategy must now come to an end.”
However, Hugo points out that concerns remain: facilities granted this suspension will, on the current proposed wording of the legislation, be permitted to comply with the weak old plant standards until their decommissioning.